Skip to main content
Back to Blog
SDI insight / Roles & decisionsBest Practices

Identify the GAP: The Key to Problem Solving

Originally published April 10, 2018Guidance reviewed August 23, 20262 min current guide

SDI Clarity Insight. This article is part of our Knowledge Base, drawing on 20+ years of organizational design and talent development expertise. Browse our L&D Glossary for key terminology.

Current practitioner guide

Turn a performance complaint into a testable gap.

Describe the difference precisely.

State the expected and observed result, population, conditions, timing, and consequence. Use available work evidence rather than labels such as low accountability or poor communication. A precise gap lets leaders agree on what is happening without agreeing prematurely on why. It also establishes a baseline that can later show whether the response changed performance rather than simply increasing activity.

Build competing causal hypotheses.

Examine process, role, decision rights, information, tools, capacity, incentives, environment, feedback, knowledge, skill, and motivation. Ask what evidence would be present if each hypothesis were true and what evidence would contradict it. In human-agent work, include automation boundaries, exception handling, control visibility, and whether people understand when to intervene. Keeping more than one plausible cause reduces solution bias.

Test before scaling the response.

Use the smallest safe test that can distinguish causes or show whether a proposed change improves the result. That may be a workflow observation, data comparison, role clarification, tool correction, targeted practice, or a bounded operating experiment. Define the decision threshold and review owner in advance. If the evidence does not move, update the diagnosis rather than defending the intervention.

Pressure-test this decision with Clara

Use the article as context, then describe the work, role, capability, or adoption challenge behind your question. Clara can help frame the decision, identify the evidence to gather, and suggest the most relevant SDI next step.

Read the original 2018 articlePreserved as historical context; the reviewed guidance above reflects SDI's current point of view.

Like most parts of life, work comes with expectations. Those expectations are typically high, but more important than the expectations are the actual results. Like in life, the success of our businesses count on everyone meeting their respective expectations. Unfortunately, most of the time that doesn't happen. It's typically not from a lack of effort, but because of real issues. The most common issue that leads to missed expectations is a lack of understanding of what is actually preventing them from being met. In my world, this is called the GAP... or the difference between the expectation and the actual outcome.

The question I always like to ask when expectations aren't being met is: What is the real problem? Usually everyone thinks they have the solution (just ask them), but often that solution does not address the real problem. By not identifying the real problem, not only does the problem not get fixed, it also creates frustration in the people affected. Our success in any organization relies on our ability to become great problem solvers. But in order to become great problem solvers, we have to become great at Identifying the GAP.

"Go see": A straightforward Lean tool known as a "Gemba Walk" encourages us to observe the situation for ourselves. Ironically most people do not use this important method. I always encourage people to show me or to get up and go watch the activity as it is happening. You will be amazed at what you learn. Incorporating this into best practices like Leader Standard Work can always help us catch the problem before it becomes too big.

Deal with the facts: So often situations become personal because most people are passionate about their jobs. That is a great problem to have but can cause conflict when trying to problem solve. The best leaders in the world love their employees but must take the emotion out of the situation and deal with the facts. I always teach people to look at the facts, meaning the expectation and what is actually occurring. Identify the GAP between the expectation and the current result because therein lies the problem. With the problem identified, we can now use all tools and resources available to solve it.

Coachable moments: So often leaders will quickly respond that they are "busy" and quickly move to resolve the first problem that presents itself. By doing this they miss out on the opportunity to coach. They give the solution, or what they think is the solution, so they can move on to the next problem or task. There are two major issues with this approach. The first is that the real problem was never really identified, and therefore it wasn't solved. The other is that our employees are usually the experts, and by quickly solving the obvious, leaders miss the opportunity to coach on how to identify the problem, and also solve the problem. We just need to guide them by asking the right questions and coaching them on how to approach the situation.

We call it Continuous Improvement for a reason - problem solving is a circle. And although we are in a relentless pursuit of perfection, it is often a challenge to obtain that goal. There is always another GAP, and in turn, another opportunity or a problem that needs to be identified and solved.

Share this article

What needs to work better?

Tell us what people need to do differently and what happens if the change falls short.

Related ideas, client examples, and next steps

Connect the choice to clear roles, evidence, and next steps.

Continue with the ideas, evidence, and SDI support that are directly relevant to this page. When a link does not add useful context, it is intentionally left out.